Gastos públicos em serviços ambulatoriais de Fonoaudiologia no Brasil entre 2009 e 2018: bases de dados do DATASUS / Public spending on outpatient speech therapy services in Brazil between 2009 and 2018: DATASUS databases

RESUMO Objetivo Analisar os gastos públicos em saúde destinados aos serviços ambulatoriais em Fonoaudiologia nas cinco Regiões Federativas do Brasil. Métodos Trata-se de um estudo ecológico realizado por meio da busca de dados secundários disponíveis em uma plataforma virtual de domínio público, DATASUS (Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde). Os dados coletados referiram-se aos valores aprovados para os procedimentos da Fonoaudiologia no período de 2009 a 2018 nas cinco Regiões Federativas. Adotou-se análise descritiva dos dados e exposição dos resultados em valores absolutos, relativos e taxas de crescimento. Resultados Verificou-se que o investimento médio em reais (R$), por ano, nos serviços de Fonoaudiologia no Brasil foi de, aproximadamente, R$ 223.952.639.232,00; sendo 47,2% dos recursos destinados à Região Sudeste. Dentre as grandes áreas de especialização, a Audiologia foi responsável por 95,4% do investimento, seguida pelas áreas da Linguagem (4,0%), Motricidade Orofacial (0,5%) e Voz (0,1%). Conclusão Os serviços fonoaudiológicos demandam considerável parcela dos recursos públicos, sendo a área da Audiologia responsável por quase metade desses gastos, seguida pelas grandes áreas da Linguagem, Motricidade Orofacial e Voz.

ABSTRACT Purpose To analyze public spending on health services to outpatient services in Speech Therapy in the five federative regions of Brazil. Methods This is an ecological study carried out through the search for secondary data available on a public domain virtual platform, DATASUS. The collected data refer to the values ​​approved for the Speech Therapy procedures in the period from 2009 to 2018 in the five federative regions. Descriptive analysis of data and exposure of results in absolute and relative values ​​and growth rates were adopted. Results It was found that the average investment in reais, per year, in speech therapy services in Brazil was approximately R$ 223,952,639,232.00, with 47.2% of the resources destined for the Southeast region. Among the major areas of specialization, Audiology accounted for 95.4% of the investment, followed by Language (4.0%), Orofacial Motricity (0.5%) and Voice (0.1%). Conclusion The findings indicate that speech therapy services demand a considerable portion of public resources, with the area of ​​Audiology being responsible for almost half of these expenses, followed by the large area of ​​Language, Orofacial Motricity and Voice.

Incentivos e desafios relacionados à condução da pesquisa científica, tecnológica e de inovação no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde no Distrito Federal, Brasil / Incentives and challenges related to technological research and innovation within the Unified Health System in the Federal District of Brazil

Resumo O objetivo deste trabalho foi analisar o perfil das pesquisas científicas financiadas no Distrito Federal provenientes das chamadas públicas do Programa Pesquisa para o SUS: Gestão Compartilhada em Saúde (PPSUS/DF) e Programa de Fomento a Pesquisa Científica da ESCS/FEPECS, no período de 2008 a 2017. O estudo é analítico e documental, abrangendo o universo das pesquisas financiadas nesses dois Programas. As variáveis foram: ano, título, tema de pesquisa da Agenda Nacional de Prioridades de Pesquisas em Saúde (ANPPS), setor de aplicação, instituição e valor financiado. No período de 2008 a 2017, 73 projetos foram financiados pelos cinco editais do PPSUS/DF. O valor total foi de aproximadamente oito milhões de reais. Em relação à ESCS/FEPECS, entre 2008 a 2017, foram financiados 85 projetos pelos dez editais lançados. O valor total foi de 2,3 milhões de reais. Concluiu-se que o perfil das pesquisas científicas permitiu uma análise crítica das temáticas dos projetos. Recomenda-se que os próximos editais adotem como prioridade de pesquisa as três principais causas de óbitos, o processo de organização e avaliação de linhas de cuidados, serviços de saúde e redes de atenção.

Abstract This article analyzes the profile of research conducted in the Federal District of Brazil funded through public calls for proposals issued by the Research for the SUS Program: shared health management/Federal District (PPSUS/DF) and a research support program run by the Superior School of Health Sciences, maintained by the Health Sciences Teaching and Research Foundation (ESCS/FEPECS, acronym in Portuguese). A document analysis was undertaken of all research funded by the PPSUS/DF and ESCS/FEPECS's Research Support Program between 2008 and 2017 using the following variables: year, title, research themes of the National Agenda for Health Research Priorities (ANPPS, acronym in Portuguese), implementing organization, area of application of research, and amount of funding. PPSUS/DF funded 73 projects with a total investment of approximately R$8 million, while ESCS/FEPECS funded 85 projects with a total investment of R$2.3 million. This study provides a critical analysis of the research themes supported by ESCS/FEPECS and PPSUS/DF between 2008 and 2017. It is recommended that future calls for proposals should prioritize the three leading causes of death in the Federal District and the organization and evaluation of healthcare services.

Expenditures on health research in sub-Saharan African countries: results of a questionnaire-based survey

Objective To estimate the sources of funds for health research (revenue) and the uses of these funds (expenditure). Design A structured questionnaire was used to solicit financial information from health research institutions. Setting Forty-two sub-Saharan African countries. Participants Key informants in 847 health research institutions in the 42 sub-Saharan African countries. Main outcome measures Expenditure on health research by institutions; funders and subject areas. Results An estimated total of US$ 302 million was spent on health research by institutions that responded to the survey in the World Health Organization (WHO) African Region for the biennium 2005-2006. The most notable funders for health research activities were external funding; ministries of health; other government ministries; own funds and non-profit institutions. Most types of health research performers spent significant portions of their resources on in-house research; with medical schools spending 82 and government agencies 62. Hospitals spent 38 of their resources on management; and other institutions (universities; firms; etc.) spent 87 of their resources on capital investment. Research on human immunodeficiency virus/tuberculosis and malaria accounted for 30 of funds; followed by research on other communicable diseases and maternal; perinatal and nutritional conditions (23). Conclusions Research on major health problems of the Region; such as communicable diseases; accounts for most of the research expenditures. However; the total expenditure is very low compared with other WHO regions

A percepção dos usuários sobre a oferta de programas de promoção da saúde e prevenção de doenças: o caso de uma operadora de autogestão / The users' perception of a health promotion and prevention program offer: a self-management operator case

A coexistência do setor público e privado de saúde no Brasil é antiga e os arranjos percorridos têm contribuído para a construção de um sistema fragmentado e complexo. Na busca por estabelecer políticas setoriais em harmonia com o Sistema Único de Saúde, a Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar tem estimulado o desenvolvimento de programas de promoção da saúde e prevenção de doenças no setor. Essas ações são consideradas como um conjunto heterogêneo de estratégias na consolidação de políticas que visem à saúde da população. Este é um estudo de caráter qualitativo que objetiva analisar esses programas em uma operadora de autogestão, com o intuito de compreender se eles produzem dispositivos biopolíticos. Foram coletados os discursos dos usuários dos programas por meio de um roteiro semiestruturado e utilizou-se a técnica de análise de conteúdo. Os resultados mostram que se encontram em curso alguns processos de reestruturação da produção do cuidado, e os aspectos relacionais têm sido priorizados nesses programas. Essas ações configuram-se em dispositivos biopolíticos conduzindo formas de viver. É importante a existência de equilíbrio entre as práticas desses poderes e a produção de liberdade, atentando para que não haja intervenções biopolíticas arbitrárias e autoritárias na produção das ações de saúde.

The coexistence of public and private health care systems in Brazil is old and their arrangements have contributed to the construction of a fragmented system. In seeking to establish policies in agreement with the Brazilian Unifed Health System, the National Agency of Supplemental Health insurance has encouraged the development of programs for health promotion and disease prevention on the private sector. These actions are a heterogeneous set of strategies to consolidate policies aiming at the population's health. This is a qualitative study that analyzes these preventive programs in a private health insurance agency, to understand whether they produce bio-political devices. Speeches were collected from users of the programs through a semi-structured script using the technique of content analysis. The results show that some restructuring processes of care production are ongoing, and relational aspects have been targeted in these programs. These actions are configured in devices leading biopolitical forms of life. It is important to have balance between these powers and the production practices of freedom, noting that there is no arbitrary and authoritarian biopolitical interventions in the production of health actions.

Evaluación de una unidad de cirugía de día / Evaluation of a day surgery unit

Objetivos. Presentar una evaluación de la Unidad de Cirugía del Día (UCD) del Centro de Asistencia del Sindicato Médico del Uruguay (CASMU) de Montevideo, instalada en el Sanatorio 1 de esta institución, un hospital de 107 camas destinado antes a la actividad quirúrgica de mediana y baja complejidad. Se analizan los resultados del proceso de reorganización de la actividad quirúrgica bajo el régimen de la cirugía de día mediante indicadores estadísticos de utilización del servicio, costos y satisfacción del paciente. Métodos. Se utilizaron las estadísticas asistenciales para determinar la cobertura del nuevo régimen, los días de internación, los costos anteriores y posteriores a la puesta en funcionamiento de la UCD y la opinión de los pacientes sobre la calidad de la atención. Resultados. Tras los primeros 2 años de funcionamiento de la UCD (1998-1999), más de un tercio de las operaciones de las especialidades seleccionadas se realizaban en el régimen de cirugía de día. Dichas especialidades representan 84 por ciento del total de las actividades quirúrgicas realizadas por la UCD. Los días de estadía en las especialidades incluidas en el sistema disminuyeron en 26 por ciento. El análisis de costo-efectividad de esta modalidad muestra resultados dos veces y media más favorables que la forma convencional. En general, los pacientes manifestaron gran satisfacción con los servicios prestados por la UCD. Discusión. Los resultados obtenidos permiten recomendar definitivamente esta forma de atención, dado que es de buena calidad, logra la satisfacción del paciente y reduce radicalmente los costos, gracias a la disminución de la estadía y de los recursos necesarios en los servicios de internación. Existen posibilidades de expansión de este nuevo régimen mediante la incorporación de otros procesos patológicos y de las técnicas elegibles

La economía del la salud: ¿debe ser de interés para el campo sanitario? / Health economics: should it concern the health sector?

This paper addresses the most important features of health economics, especially its scope and applications within the sphere of health. Health economics is a field of study which allows countries to gear their health policies toward making more rational use of their resources and expanding and improving their health care services. Such policies should, on the other hand, aim to generate strategies for adequately managing human, technical, economic, and financial resources so as to reap the finest health benefits possible. A knowledge of how economics can be applied to health will enable health professionals to introduce an economics culture into their daily work. In other words, it will allow them to keep in mind the scope of their various working tools¾health planning, national health accounts and accounting, and economic assessment methods, which include health and pharmaceutical technology assessment and pharmacoeconomics¾as well as the place that economics has in health research. Hopefully, a knowledge of these aspects of economic analysis will provide decision-makers with one more tool they can apply in selecting more efficient options and attaining the highest health benefits at the lowest possible cost for the national health system

Further observations on comparison of immunization coverage by lot quality assurance sampling and 30 cluster sampling.

Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) and standard EPI methodology (30 cluster sampling) were used to evaluate immunization coverage in a Primary Health Center (PHC) where coverage levels were reported to be more than 85%. Of 27 sub-centers (lots) evaluated by LQAS, only 2 were accepted for child coverage, whereas none was accepted for tetanus toxoid (TT) coverage in mothers. LQAS data were combined to obtain an estimate of coverage in the entire population; 41% (95% CI 36-46) infants were immunized appropriately for their ages, while 42% (95% CI 37-47) of their mothers had received a second/ booster dose of TT. TT coverage in 149 contemporary mothers sampled in EPI survey was also 42% (95% CI 31-52). Although results by the two sampling methods were consistent with each other, a big gap was evident between reported coverage (in children as well as mothers) and survey results. LQAS was found to be operationally feasible, but it cost 40% more and required 2.5 times more time than the EPI survey. LQAS therefore, is not a good substitute for current EPI methodology to evaluate immunization coverage in a large administrative area. However, LQAS has potential as method to monitor health programs on a routine basis in small population sub-units, especially in areas with high and heterogeneously distributed immunization coverage.